ShopDreamUp AI ArtDreamUp
Deviation Actions
After just 24 hours the "Smash the Hate" campaign is gaining real traction. Some 21 groups have published it (many at their request), more than 600 deviants have viewed it, and nearly 50 have faved it.
More to the point, the overt Nazis on dA are feeling the heat, just like they did in Dresden: I'm getting spammed like crazy which is a clear indication that they are anxious about what lies ahead.
They should be.
Despite the assertions of some of them that they can't be touched because dA is based in California and the anti-hate laws to which I referred in the original post are European, this is not the case. There have been a series of successful legal actions launched in Europe to force U.S.-based web entities, including Yahoo, to pull down pro-Nazi content, to reveal who the Nazis are who use their services, and to otherwise interdict their efforts to spread their hate using the protections that democracies afford their citizens, but that Nazis don't.
The following article by Alina Dain Sharon, www.jweekly.com/article/full/6… which appears in the March 21, 2013 edition of Jweekly, an on-line publication based in San Francisco, makes it pretty clear that even if there is no U.S. law banning the kind of hate speech this campaign seeks to remove from dA, European law DOES have the necessary reach to persuade U.S.-based companies such as dA that they are far better off removing this material than permitting it to remain on their websites.
European, U.S. Laws Clash on Policing Online Hate Speech
by Alina Dain Sharon, Jweekly.com, March 21, 2013
Last October, the hashtag #unbonjuif (#agoodjew) was trending as the third-most tweeted subject in France. Users jumped on the chance to tweet phrases like "a good Jew is a dead Jew," ultimately forcing the French Jewish students' union to file a lawsuit against Twitter for allowing that content to appear. When a French court decided in January that the San Francisco–based Twitter must reveal the identities of users who sent out those anti-Semitic tweets, a cross-continental debate ensued on the difficulty of defining and policing anti-Semitism online.
The French incident hardly was the first case of hate in social media and on the Web. The Simon Wiesenthal Center's 2012 Digital Terrorism and Hate Report found more than 15,000 websites, social networks, forums, online games and apps that disseminated hateful content. In Europe, a report last month by Community Security Trust showed that the number of anti-Semitic incidents via social media in the U.K. had grown nearly 700 percent from a year ago.
"Social media is becoming more and more of a problem for us if you look at anti-Semitism," said Ronald Eissens, co-founder of the Dutch anti-racism group Magenta and the International Network Against CyberHate, which has members in 20 countries. "There's a lot of it around. Prosecution is a lot harder because most social media are based firmly in the U.S."
In 2000, France prosecuted the Sunnyvale-based Yahoo for selling Nazi memorabilia online. In France, it is illegal to display such items unless they are in a theatrical or museum setting. A French court ruled at the time that Yahoo had to make the auction site inaccessible to French users or pay a fine. Although it never legally accepted the French ruling, Yahoo eventually removed the auction.
Then, in 2012, Twitter, Facebook and YouTube complied with German law by either taking down material posted by a neo-Nazi group or by blocking users in Germany from access to the content, according to the New York Times.
Additional broad laws have been passed on racism and cyberhate. The Council of Europe's Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime was passed in 2003 and went into effect in 2006. The protocol criminalized racist and xenophobic acts committed through computer systems. The European Framework Decision on Combating Racism and Xenophobia was passed in 2008.
In 2005, the European Union Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia's working definition of anti-Semitism was released, defining the phenomenon as "a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews."
Additionally, the definition specified that anti-Semitic "manifestations could also target the state of Israel, conceived as Jewish collectivity." Though that definition was never legally binding, various international bodies, several law enforcement agencies and European courts have used it in their investigations. It is essentially meant to "help police forces who are monitoring anti-Semitism on the ground to have a better understanding of what anti-Semitism is," said Kenneth Stern, the American Jewish Committee's specialist on anti-Semitism and extremism.
Under the First Amendment, hate speech in the U.S. must be likely to cause violence or harm before it can be deemed criminal. But in the European Union, speech can be prohibited even if it is only abusive, insulting or likely to disturb public order, noted Talia Naamat, legal researcher at the Kantor Center for the Study of Contemporary European Jewry in Jerusalem.
There are many laws on Holocaust denial in Europe, including in Germany, Belgium and Austria, where British Holocaust denier David Irving was convicted and imprisoned in 2006. European laws on the issue, however, are not uniformly applied across the EU. Even the European Court of Human Rights does not offer an accepted definition for "hate speech."
Prosecutors therefore exercise a great amount of discretion, as do law enforcement officers, who must decide whether to classify the act as a hate crime, and judges, who must assess which action or speech is likely to disturb public order. "That assessment can be subjective," Naamat said.
More to the point, the overt Nazis on dA are feeling the heat, just like they did in Dresden: I'm getting spammed like crazy which is a clear indication that they are anxious about what lies ahead.
They should be.
Despite the assertions of some of them that they can't be touched because dA is based in California and the anti-hate laws to which I referred in the original post are European, this is not the case. There have been a series of successful legal actions launched in Europe to force U.S.-based web entities, including Yahoo, to pull down pro-Nazi content, to reveal who the Nazis are who use their services, and to otherwise interdict their efforts to spread their hate using the protections that democracies afford their citizens, but that Nazis don't.
The following article by Alina Dain Sharon, www.jweekly.com/article/full/6… which appears in the March 21, 2013 edition of Jweekly, an on-line publication based in San Francisco, makes it pretty clear that even if there is no U.S. law banning the kind of hate speech this campaign seeks to remove from dA, European law DOES have the necessary reach to persuade U.S.-based companies such as dA that they are far better off removing this material than permitting it to remain on their websites.
European, U.S. Laws Clash on Policing Online Hate Speech
by Alina Dain Sharon, Jweekly.com, March 21, 2013
Last October, the hashtag #unbonjuif (#agoodjew) was trending as the third-most tweeted subject in France. Users jumped on the chance to tweet phrases like "a good Jew is a dead Jew," ultimately forcing the French Jewish students' union to file a lawsuit against Twitter for allowing that content to appear. When a French court decided in January that the San Francisco–based Twitter must reveal the identities of users who sent out those anti-Semitic tweets, a cross-continental debate ensued on the difficulty of defining and policing anti-Semitism online.
The French incident hardly was the first case of hate in social media and on the Web. The Simon Wiesenthal Center's 2012 Digital Terrorism and Hate Report found more than 15,000 websites, social networks, forums, online games and apps that disseminated hateful content. In Europe, a report last month by Community Security Trust showed that the number of anti-Semitic incidents via social media in the U.K. had grown nearly 700 percent from a year ago.
"Social media is becoming more and more of a problem for us if you look at anti-Semitism," said Ronald Eissens, co-founder of the Dutch anti-racism group Magenta and the International Network Against CyberHate, which has members in 20 countries. "There's a lot of it around. Prosecution is a lot harder because most social media are based firmly in the U.S."
In 2000, France prosecuted the Sunnyvale-based Yahoo for selling Nazi memorabilia online. In France, it is illegal to display such items unless they are in a theatrical or museum setting. A French court ruled at the time that Yahoo had to make the auction site inaccessible to French users or pay a fine. Although it never legally accepted the French ruling, Yahoo eventually removed the auction.
Then, in 2012, Twitter, Facebook and YouTube complied with German law by either taking down material posted by a neo-Nazi group or by blocking users in Germany from access to the content, according to the New York Times.
Additional broad laws have been passed on racism and cyberhate. The Council of Europe's Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime was passed in 2003 and went into effect in 2006. The protocol criminalized racist and xenophobic acts committed through computer systems. The European Framework Decision on Combating Racism and Xenophobia was passed in 2008.
In 2005, the European Union Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia's working definition of anti-Semitism was released, defining the phenomenon as "a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews."
Additionally, the definition specified that anti-Semitic "manifestations could also target the state of Israel, conceived as Jewish collectivity." Though that definition was never legally binding, various international bodies, several law enforcement agencies and European courts have used it in their investigations. It is essentially meant to "help police forces who are monitoring anti-Semitism on the ground to have a better understanding of what anti-Semitism is," said Kenneth Stern, the American Jewish Committee's specialist on anti-Semitism and extremism.
Under the First Amendment, hate speech in the U.S. must be likely to cause violence or harm before it can be deemed criminal. But in the European Union, speech can be prohibited even if it is only abusive, insulting or likely to disturb public order, noted Talia Naamat, legal researcher at the Kantor Center for the Study of Contemporary European Jewry in Jerusalem.
There are many laws on Holocaust denial in Europe, including in Germany, Belgium and Austria, where British Holocaust denier David Irving was convicted and imprisoned in 2006. European laws on the issue, however, are not uniformly applied across the EU. Even the European Court of Human Rights does not offer an accepted definition for "hate speech."
Prosecutors therefore exercise a great amount of discretion, as do law enforcement officers, who must decide whether to classify the act as a hate crime, and judges, who must assess which action or speech is likely to disturb public order. "That assessment can be subjective," Naamat said.
Bernie Sanders: Democratic Strategy is 'Pathetic'
Senator Bernie Sanders sits down with Salon to talk inequality, the GOP, and whether or not he'll run for president.
by Thomas Frank
SALON Magazine
SUNDAY, SEP 28, 2014 07:00 AM EDT
Bernie Sanders is a legendary political independent from Vermont. Over the years, he has served as mayor of Burlington, the largest city in that state; as a member of the House of Representatives; and (currently) as a United States Senator. We met last week in his office in one of the Senate office buildings in Washington, D.C., and discussed the Clinton years, the way to beat the Right, and whether or not he should run for president in 2016. Needless to say,
Anatomy of the Deep State
billmoyers.com
February 21, 2014
by Mike Lofgren
Rome lived upon its principal till ruin stared it in the face. Industry is the only true source of wealth, and there was no industry in Rome. By day the Ostia road was crowded with carts and muleteers, carrying to the great city the silks and spices of the East, the marble of Asia Minor, the timber of the Atlas, the grain of Africa and Egypt; and the carts brought out nothing but loads of dung. That was their return cargo.
– The Martyrdom of Man by Winwood Reade (1871)
There is the visible government situated around the Mall in Washington, and then there is another, more shadowy, more
401(k)s Are Robbery: The Attack on Social Security
JAMES W. RUSSELL
Salon Magazine
SATURDAY, MAY 10, 2014 02:00 PM EDT
On the eve of the Reagan presidency in 1980, Milton and Rose Friedman published “Free to Choose,” a proposal for gradually phasing out Social Security. The entitlements of retirees would be honored as would the accumulated credits of contributors who had not yet retired. But no new payroll taxes would be collected. The final elimination of Social Security would allow “individuals to provide for their own retirement as they wish.” Among the advantages would be that “it would add to personal saving and so lead to a higher rate of capital formati
What Jesus Really Said About the Poor
On this Christmas Day, it might be nice to remember what Jesus really said about the poor.
Luke 6:20-21 Then he looked up at his disciples and said: 'Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God. 'Blessed are you who are hungry now, for you will be filled. 'Blessed are you who weep now, for you will laugh.'
Luke 4:16-19 When he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up, he went to the synagogue on the sabbath day, as was his custom. He stood up to read, and the scroll of the prophet Isaiah was given to him. He unrolled the scroll and found the place where it was written:
'The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he
Featured in Groups
© 2013 - 2024 poasterchild
Comments42
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
I've got your back dude